Steve Sammons
  • marketing
  • leadership
  • technology
    • SEO
  • marketing
  • leadership
  • technology
0
0
0
0
0
Steve Sammons
  • marketing
  • leadership
  • technology
    • SEO

Why Are We Spending So Much Time Talking About This?

Board members are frustrated.

Meeting after meeting passes without enough time on Ends.

They ask, “Why are we spending so much time talking about this?”

Carver and Charney put the responsibility back where it belongs in rehearsal 5.5.[1]

The board should change its own agenda.

A weak agenda is not weather. It is a governance choice. Reports, announcements, committee updates, and operating anecdotes occupy time because the board permits them to.

I would begin with an agenda audit.

Review the last six meetings. Mark every minute spent on Ends, ownership linkage, policy development, monitoring, governance education, and operational detail. The pattern will be clearer than anyone’s memory.

BoardSource recommends agendas that emphasize strategic questions and use consent agendas for routine matters.[2] The purpose is not to make meetings faster. It is to reserve collective attention for work only the board can do.

I would build the annual agenda before building the monthly one.

When will the board learn from owners?

When will it review each Ends policy?

When will it receive scheduled monitoring reports?

When will it evaluate CEO performance?

When will it assess its own conduct and development?

When will major future questions receive education and deliberation?

Place those commitments on a twelve-month calendar. Then fit routine business around them.

The Chief Governance Officer should protect the design. The CEO may help prepare information and recommend policy questions, but the board owns its time.

A practical meeting can follow a simple arc.

Begin with the people on whose behalf the board governs.

Take one consequential Ends question.

Make any policy decision that is ready.

Judge scheduled monitoring evidence.

Use a consent agenda for routine approvals that truly require board action.

End by evaluating the meeting against the board’s own policy.

This does not mean every operating fact is forbidden. Operational information can educate the board, reveal a policy gap, or support monitoring. The chair should ask why the information is present.

If it does not lead to a board judgment, it may belong in a written update.

Committee reports deserve the same test. A committee should not narrate activity merely because members worked hard. Bring a recommendation, a policy implication, or evidence the board must judge.

There is a human reason boards drift. Operating problems feel concrete. Ends require the board to make choices about beneficiaries, results, priority, and cost. Those choices can expose disagreement.

Busy agendas help a board avoid that discomfort.

I would place the hard Ends question near the beginning, not in the final ten minutes. Give members reading in advance. Use a clear decision question. Let the board hear voices outside the room when the issue requires ownership insight.

You can recover two hours without adding a meeting.

Stop reading reports aloud.

Move routine items to consent.

Limit announcements.

Send CEO updates in writing.

Refuse committee minutes that contain no board work.

Then spend the recovered time deciding what difference the organization should make.

A board meeting should not be a tour of everything the organization did.

It should be the place where the board governs what the organization is for.

One more discipline helps: write the desired meeting outcome beside every agenda item. “For information” is often too weak. Use “decide,” “judge compliance,” “learn before future policy,” or “hear owner values.” If no governing outcome can be named, remove the item or send it another way.

The label changes how members prepare and how the chair closes the conversation.

Footnotes

[1] Miriam Carver and Bill Charney, The Board Member’s Playbook (Jossey-Bass, 2004), rehearsal 5.5, pages 160–163.

[2] BoardSource, “Strategic Board Meetings”.

Additional reading

Richard P. Chait, William P. Ryan, and Barbara E. Taylor’s Governance as Leadership offers a richer way to frame consequential board conversations.

John Carver’s Boards That Make a Difference helps boards organize agendas around Ends, policy, and monitoring.

Recent Posts
  • The Silent Power of Perfect Timing
  • The Outsider Who Changed Everything
  • The Reject They Came Crawling Back For
  • Give Me the Hard One
steve-sammons
Steve shares insights and strategies for business transformation, brand development, and sustainable growth—always rooted in faith-based principles and a commitment to purposeful leadership across diverse industries.
Receive Updates

We don’t spam!
Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Steve Sammons
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Copyright 2026

Input your search keywords and press Enter.